America’s Prophet: Moses And The American Story
by Bruce Feiler
American Jesus: How the Son of God Became a National Icon
by Stephen Prothero
Judas: A Biography
by Susan Gubar
Satan in America: The Devil We Know
by W. Scott Poole
The death of biography is always being proclaimed, but I’d like to announce a renaissance of a curious subgenre: biographies of people who have transcended the earthly realm. Ever since Jack Miles’ Pulitzer prize-winning 1996 book God: A Biography, the conceit has been applied to numerous other larger-than-life religious figures. I’m not talking here about the kind of biography in which archaeologists or theologians might piece together obscure evidence to create a portrait of the historical life (or lack thereof) of Moses or Jesus or Judas. I’m talking about books that trace the rich history of interpretations—literary, artistic, and political—of gods, men, and the devil.
Instead of exploring the actual life of a religious figure—from birth to bar mitzvah and beyond—these biographies follow their cultural afterlife. This is a tricky business. Biographers know that telling a life story involves a lot of shaping and that every biography needs an angle, especially when your subject is bigger than Jesus. But having an angle on Moses or Jesus would mean making a religious argument, and that would be theology or hagiography—not biography.
This is the trap that Bruce Feiler falls into with his recently released America’s Prophet: Moses and the American Story. Feiler is a popular writer known mostly for his Walking the Bible book and PBS series. He characterizes Moses as an imperfect human nominated by God to overturn unjust human authorities. The Moses story has a great many American analogs, from presidents Washington and Lincoln, to civil rights leaders Harriet Tubman and Martin Luther King Jr. But the pathos of Moses is that he never quite succeeds, never makes it himself to the promised land.
All of these historical figures participate in the American cycle of revolution, failure, and redemption—explained by distinguished Harvard theologian Peter Gomes: “We have the Revolution, but then slavery. We have the Civil War, but then Jim Crow. It’s similar to the pattern described in the Hebrew Bible. First they’re faithful, then they become successful. Then they become unfaithful, God destroys them, and they become unsuccessful again. Then they repent and the cycle starts over.” Feiler takes this interpretation and runs with it, at one point declaring that he’s found “the one story that affects everyone in America.”
But there’s still at least one other figure that, as much as we loathe to admit it, comes instantly to mind when we think of Moses in America, one who doesn’t necessarily fit in as redeemer—Charlton Heston in a red-and-gold robe and massive white beard, holding court as the ultimate action-hero Moses in The Ten Commandments. Cecil B. DeMille’s spectacularly successful creation is Moses the enforcer, not Moses the liberator. This Moses is reactionary, not visionary.
The concluding chapters proclaim Moses’s greatness with unalloyed zeal. Moses is “our true founding father” whose “face belongs on Mount Rushmore,” “a looking glass into our soul,” and the “thinker” that has had the longest sustained influence over American life—that’s right, greater than Jefferson, Einstein, or Edison. Feiler’s wide-eyed earnestness is much more endearing when it doesn’t come with such certainty—when he interviews people who contradict his own beliefs, or whose own lives express more eloquently the inspiring role of Moses than his own narrative could.
Feiler writes that he didn’t set out to unseat Jesus from the throne of the American figurehead but as he went on, he felt that Moses should have the crown—the Exodus story is simply more relevant to the myth of America than the Crucifixion. He may be right, but Stephen Prothero, author of the 2004 book American Jesus, isn’t weighing in. Prothero, recently the author of Religious Literacy, offers a nuanced, surprising and sympathetic account of the way our American idea of Jesus has changed since the founding of the United States.
In American history, it seems you can’t encounter Jesus without echoes of Moses. Moses is human, chosen by God but continually humbled. Jesus is the next coming, human but also divine. Moses is about deliverance from oppression. Jesus is about redemption. But the two heroes overlap, as both authors recognize. The African-American Christian tradition has often merged New and Old Testament imagery in its folklore. Lincoln may have resembled Moses to the public, but he was more like Jesus in private.
For America’s founding Puritans, Jesus wasn’t such a big deal. They were more concerned with the faceless, fear-and-trembling Old Testament God—Moses’ God. So how did Jesus get to be the driving force behind the Protestant revivals of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries? Throughout Christian history, innovators have proclaimed that there is a difference, between “the religion of Jesus”—the actual teachings of the carpenter from Nazareth—and “the religion about Jesus”—the cumbersome, ritualistic theology that churches built up around Jesus. Possibly the most unlikely of these reformers is Thomas Jefferson—inventor of the separation of church and state, who was in his time denounced as an atheist or even the anti-Christ. But Jefferson’s infamous re-mix of the Bible, which cut out essentially everything but the words of Jesus, was according to Prothero, not a destructive but a creative act, an act of respect for Jesus, or at least “a rational sort of Jesus that a leader like Jefferson could follow.” Throughout the various Great Awakenings of American history, this cycle continued: cutting away the non-Jesus parts of Christianity, until Protestant sects were left by the twentieth century with the notion of “Jesus alone.”
The second and more daring half of American Jesus takes place outside of Christianity altogether. We follow the pluralistic journey of Jesus’ extra-Christian reincarnations—from Broadway star in Godspell and Jesus Christ Superstar, to his reclamation by a small coterie of early twentieth-century rabbis as the consummate Jew, to his reincarnation as a model Hindu swami through the American Vedanta Society. Prothero argues that such complete re-imaginings of Jesus have actually enabled Jesus to survive and prosper as an American icon. New citizens, carefully balancing assimilation with cultural uniqueness, must reckon with Jesus in order to proclaim their Americanness.
So Jesus lives on: as a Christian prophet, yes, but also as a rock star, a rabbi, a swami, a bodhisattva, and a revolutionary. Prothero borrows the Hindu concept of the “avatar,” a Sanskrit word meaning the repeated descent of the divine gods onto Earth in human form. The idea that there could be only one such incarnation, the Savior Christ, is anathema to this American Hindu movement, as it is to Prothero’s book as a whole.
Whereas Feiler takes the culturally conservative line that “secularism, globalism, and pluralism threaten to undermine the Bible’s influence,” Prothero would heartily disagree. “The problem with this critique is that it assumes an unchanging Jesus [or Moses], untainted by human history, who is somehow being violated by his many resurrections and reincarnations. From the perspective of theology, an unchanging Jesus may be a necessity From the perspective of cultural and religious history, however, Jesus is anything but unchanging.” In those terms, Feiler’s America’s Prophet would be theology and Prothero’s American Jesus would be a cultural history.
There is perhaps no character in Christianity more deserving of Prothero’s brand of meticulous cultural-biographical treatment than Judas. Mysterious, existing mostly as a foil to Jesus, Judas embodies the conflict of Christian love and duty. If he was destined to fulfill God’s will by betraying Jesus, then why should Christians abhor him as a traitor? Didn’t he actually make the greatest sacrifice of all Christ’s disciples? Unfortunately, Susan Gubar’s Judas: A Biography does not live up to its subject’s possibilities. Though Gubar sticks closest to the biographer’s stock and trade—discussing Judas’s troubled “adolescence” in the Middle Ages, and his maturity in the late twentieth century, she seems overwhelmed by the variety of possible interpretations, and her tale reads less like a narrative biography and more like a feverish academic treatise. (Joan Acocella discusses the book’s problems at length in her recent New Yorker article
Satan in America: The Devil We Know likewise sounds promising. Shouldn’t the “life story” of Satan in America be titillating and fantastic? There he was at the Salem witch trials, with the Ku Klux Klan, at the crossroads with Robert Johnson, running rampant among the corrupt youth of the 1980s, sticking razor blades into Halloween apples. Author W. Scott Poole has a compelling concept: Satan is America’s convenient scapegoat for evil. When we don’t want to focus on the banality of evil—the mass, institutional violence America has perpetrated on the world from the colonial days to the My Lai massacre—we simply give it horns and a tail. Yet somehow, the book falls prey to both over-simplification and theological abstraction. Perhaps because Satan is even less human than Jesus or Moses—he doesn’t really have a body, after all—there is less to hang a narrative on.
Contrary to the conventional wisdom that villains are more interesting than heroes, the biographies of Judas and of Satan fall flat in comparison with those of Moses and Jesus, however different in style and scope those two investigations of “good people” are. Why? It seems that Jesus and Moses’ very beloved-ness is what makes for compelling storytelling. It is not Jesus or Moses themselves who are interesting—because there is no such thing as “Jesus himself.” It’s because we Americans think of Jesus and Moses as heroes, we turn to them in times of struggle or trial, when we are being crucified and resurrected when we are parting the Red Sea and closing it again ahead of the Pharoah’s mob. And it is in those times that we have the most to say, and the most to learn.
Each of these afterlife-biographies has more to say about the author’s perspectives toward religion and politics in America than they do about any generic Moses, Jesus, or Judas. Which is as it should be, because, as these biographies collectively teach us, there is no generic, universal concept of Moses, Jesus, or Judas. The reality is far messier—and far more interesting—than that.
January 19, 2010Canadian subscribers add $10; All other international subscribers add $40.
Comments Post a Comment »
Hi LQ,
Love your work!
Just wanting to know where the image of Jesus as a wrestler/boxer is from? I'd like to use it as a style reference for a project I am working on, and it would good to track down its source.
Cheers,
Ben, Australia.
Posted by Ben on Thu 28 Jan 2010