Monday, September 22nd, 2014
Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr / Podcast

Bookmark and Share

Dickens in Lagos



Two years ago in Rangoon, I met a toothpick-thin, boisterous young Burmese man called Somerset. He had conferred this nickname on himself at age sixteen, after renting a collection of stories by W. Somerset Maugham from one of the bookstalls on Pansodan Road. By memorizing sentences from the collection, Somerset taught himself a somewhat formal and archaic English. Then he moved on to Charles Dickens. His identification with the works of these long-dead British writers was total. “All of those characters are me,” Somerset explained. “Neither a British nor American young man living in the twenty-first century can understand a Dickens as well as I can. I am living in a Dickens atmosphere. Our country is at least one or two centuries behind the Western world. My neighborhood—bleak, poor, with small domestic industries, children playing on the street, the parents are fighting with each other, some are with great debt, everyone is dirty. That is Dickens. In that Dickens atmosphere I grew up. I am more equipped to understand Dickens than modern novels. I don’t know what is air conditioning, what is subway, what is fingerprint exam.”

Somerset helped make sense of an impression that had been hovering in my mind, just beyond articulation, for many years during travels through countries in Africa and Asia that are a century or two behind the Western world. Talking with an itinerant used-clothing peddler in eastern Uganda, or a Nigerian girl newly arrived in Lagos who had to prostitute herself to work off a debt, or an educated Iraqi who made his living selling cigarettes and secondhand books, I would experience a sense of déjà vu that took me entirely out of my own life and time. It felt as if I were meeting a character from one of the great novels of the late-nineteenth century—Our Mutual Friend, Sister Carrie, or something by George Gissing or Thomas Hardy. Reading Jude the Obscure on a trip through Kenya, I began to see its hero’s frustrated aspirations in every young person with a worthless high-school diploma, a menial job, and a tattered paperback copy of a self-improvement guide. Jude is far more alive today in Mombasa than in Wessex.

The concerns of that literature—the individual caught in an encompassing social web, the sensitive young mind trapped inside an indifferent world, the beguiling journey from countryside to metropolis, the dismal inventiveness with which people survive, the permanent gap between imagination and opportunity, the big families whose problems are lived out in the street, the tragic pregnancies, the ubiquity of corruption, the earnest efforts at self-education, the preciousness of books, the squalid factories and debtor’s prisons, the valuable garbage, the complex rules of patronage and extortion, the sudden turns of fortune, the sidewalk con men and legless beggars, the slum as theater of the grotesque: long after these things dropped out of Western literature, they became the stuff of ordinary life elsewhere, in places where modernity is arriving but hasn’t begun to solve the problems of people thrown together in the urban cauldron.

The special power of the late-nineteenth-century novel comes from the proximity of acute sentience and overwhelming circumstance. Its moral atmosphere depends on characters whose awareness and ambition are too large for the social order (described with relentless detail) into which fate has thrown them. They are painfully conscious of the contours of their society, the dominance of money, the price of transgression, the place on the scale of rank and clout of everyone they encounter. Life is an endless battle for survival, and happiness is not the lot of the sensitive. They feel too much, want too much, and are ultimately driven into a state of hopeless revolt or else bitter surrender. This situation affords an emotional register of yearning and pathos that is almost absent from modern fiction, and has never been dominant among American novelists, who, with exceptions like Theodore Dreiser and later Richard Wright, have been drawn to the free individual more than the social victim. When Tom Wolfe tried to resurrect the social novel in the 1980s and 1990s, he was laboring under two handicaps that sabotaged his project: his own limits as a novelist and the fact that, a hundred years late, the effort was bound to suffer from self-consciousness and inauthenticity.

With Dickens, the sheer energy of invention (as well as the irresistible temptation of sentimentality) lightens up the darker implications of his vision. By contrast, a writer like Gissing, a late Victorian who was not blessed with Dickens’ dazzling imagination and bravura style but made up for it in hard-won sensitivity to the daily humiliations of London life, produced, in the course of a short life, novel after novel about men and women whose aspirations always end in suffering and sordid compromise. His eye for the petty details of thwarted lives was flawless. In New Grub Street, about the literary life, Edwin Reardon, an idealistic novelist with a practical-minded, money-conscious wife, is afflicted with a terminal case of writer’s block and ends up losing both his marriage and his trade. When the couple make an effort at reconciliation, the writer is too poor to take the bus to his mother-in-law’s house; instead, he walks miles in a downpour without an overcoat (his has grown threadbare), and shows up in such shabby clothing that his wife, noticing his “muddy and shapeless boots,” can’t look him in the eye. “Both had come to this meeting prepared for a renewal of amity, but in these first few moments, each was so disagreeably impressed by the look and language of the other that a revulsion of feeling undid all the more hopeful effects of their long severance.” In the end, as the novelist lies dying in a coastal town, his best friend Harold Biffen (another struggling writer) takes a break from the deathwatch to walk along the beach. “The drives and promenades were thronged with people in exuberant health and spirits. Biffen regarded this spectacle with resentful scorn; at another time it would have moved him merely to mirth, but not even the sound of the breakers when he had wandered as far as possible from human contact could help him to think with resignation of the injustice which triumphs so flagrantly in the destinies of men.”

The conditions for Gissing’s version of unhappiness, and Hardy’s, and Dreiser’s (and, earlier, Balzac’s), no longer exist in the civilizations that produced their work. In the great cities of the West, the standard of living is too high, public life too rationalized, social taxonomy too fluid, and aesthetic taste too jaundiced, for a novel to turn on the main character’s frayed overcoat and muddy boots. Modernity and the welfare state did away with the naked sympathies and tragic destinies of the late-nineteenth-century novel. For this reason, in a country like Burma, which has experienced neither modernity nor the welfare state, an intense young reader is better equipped to enter the world of Dickens than anyone in Los Angeles or New York, and knows it. Also for this reason, Dickens’ real heirs are less likely to have grown up in London than Bombay. It’s no accident that one of the few great works of social realism of recent years was produced by an Indian-born writer, Rohinton Mistry, whose novel A Fine Balance begins with this epigraph from Balzac: “Holding this book in your hand, sinking back in your soft armchair, you will say to yourself: perhaps it will amuse me. And after you have read this story of great misfortunes, you will no doubt dine well, blaming the author for your own insensitivity, accusing him of wild exaggeration and flights of fancy. But rest assured: this tragedy is not a fiction. All is true.”

All is true. In vast, impoverished cities like Bombay, Cairo, Jakarta, Rio, or Lagos, the plot lines of the nineteenth century proliferate. Not ignorant mass suffering, but the ordeal of sentient individuals who are daily exposed to a world of possibilities through a sheet of glass—satellite TV, the Internet—that keeps them out. The extreme conditions of megacity slums contain the extravagant material that animated Dickens. In the gap between what their inhabitants know and feel and what they can have lies all the poignancy of Hardy.

A few years ago, I spent two weeks in Lagos, where sixteen million people live (by 2015 it is projected to be the third-largest city in the world). I was looking at its slums, which turned out to coincide with the city itself. Even in the few wealthy enclaves, children hawked cell phones and cigarettes in traffic, unlicensed motorcycle taxis filled the streets, and illegal hovels sprouted like mushrooms between the walled houses. The whole city is a slum, and also a market, and seen from the air (a vantage point that the Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas sought for a project on postmodern urbanization), its undifferentiated human swarms seem to move with the blind logic of insect colonies. At street level the city feels like sheer, threatening chaos. In fact a complex, informal, but quite rigid hierarchy controls life in Lagos, one that a reader of Oliver Twist would immediately recognize.

In the relentless daily commercial hustle, everyone has an economic place in a system based on patronage: the person above you (your oga, or master) provides a subsistence living and protection of sorts, for which you owe him a pledge of loyalty and a cut of your earnings. For example, the boys who scavenge the gutters and streets for pieces of discarded plastic sell their haul to their oga, who in turn sells it to a plastics grinder. Lagos attracts the ambitious and desperate young from all over West Africa, 6,000 of them a day. They are drawn by stories of quick wealth, spread by immigrants who return home over the holidays flashing new clothes and gifts. When a newcomer arrives in the city, he’s initially dependent on an oga for a place to sleep and a meal or two. The charity lasts around twenty-four hours, then the new arrival is on his own and has to start paying back his oga for the kindness. Illusions quickly die, and he soon realizes what a young man who was cutting hardwood boards in a sawmill told me: “Nobody will care for you, and you have to struggle to survive.” But there is a great deal of latitude for entrepreneurship of a desperate kind (in a wholesale market, the poorest of the poor charge a few cents to wash the mud off the market women’s feet), which accounts for the spirit of striving that prevails in Lagos and molds people’s faces into a hard, weary, calculating expression.

One day I met a plastics grinder named Andrew Okolie, whose dark concrete shop stood under an expressway. The storerooms overflowed to the ceilings with dirty kitchenware, milk cartons, shampoo bottles, and other scavenged plastic. Because the power in the area was out—an ordinary occurrence—his two grinders had been idle for several days, and because Okolie lacked connections, he was unable to take out a bank loan of twenty thousand dollars and buy a generator that would allow him to grind one ton a day and hire a handful of youthful employees. Sitting idle and angrily chewing a piece of gum, Okolie explained to me the corruption that controlled life in Lagos from top to bottom and kept a man like him from ever getting his head above water.

Okolie supplied ground plastic to a middle-aged recycler named Babatunde Ilufoye. Ilufoye lived in a shabby-genteel neighborhood that was quickly descending into a full-blown slum, but like most people in Lagos he managed to dress with impeccable neatness, and he had impressive work habits. But like Okolie, he encountered nothing but obstacles: was suffering from the worldwide reputation of Nigerians for Internet scams and other cons, and he had a hard time finding customers overseas to whom he could export the ground-up fragments. Ilufoye, who had gotten into plastics recycling through a random Google search in an Internet cafe, once emailed a suspicious Pakistani importer, “Do you expect me to commit a crime at this age and be locked up? If I’m not a fool at twenty-one or thirty, how can I be a fool now?” There was a market for what Ilufoye was selling; he knew this because he had Google and email. But he didn’t have money. It occurred to me that if Ilufoye and Okolie lived elsewhere, they would have been successful businessmen.

At the bottom of the chain in the plastics-recycling business are the thousands of pickers who crawl across the city’s huge municipal dumps, waiting for garbage trucks to unload and then sifting through the muck with a piece of steel rebar in the shape of a sharpened hook. In one such dump, standing at the bottom of a cliff of compressed garbage and surrounded by the shanties of the pickers, I met a municipal worker named Aremu Hakeem, who escorted me across the site and pointed out recent improvements. He was very proud of the dump’s organization; he called it a “reference point” for the rest of the country. He told me that he had read books about landfills and regularly looked online for garbage-related sites. Then he fell silent. It felt as if he had taken a brief trip of the imagination and suddenly returned to find himself standing next to a mountain of garbage, amid the noise of the trucks and the intense labors of the pickers. “Someday I would like to come to your country and use what I have here,” Hakeem said, and he pointed at his head. “Here we are not using it very much.”

A speck of hodgepodge knowledge and hungry consciousness amid the tidal movements of Lagos refuse, Aremu Hakeem needs a social system that knows how to put his yearnings to use. Until that day comes, he needs a great novelist, one who understands him from the inside, and who can tell the world of the possibility and waste that crowd all the sordid corners of our world.

Bookmark and Share
Love this? Subscribe to Lapham's Quarterly today.

Comments Post a Comment »

  • A beautiful piece. I would bring up the (counter-)example of the Wire as a contemporary American social realist masterpiece. Perhaps the sensibility of the Wire is so striking because it's out of phase--a modern city revealed as pre-modern tragedy. One can only hope that this article is right, and that the conditions for the bleak social determinism depicted in the Wire no longer exist.

    Posted by Will on Fri 24 Sep 2010

  • There is a Dickensian story in almost all major cities. While I cannot say for books, a few Nollywood movies tell this sort of story about Lagos.

    Posted by Myne Whitman on Mon 4 Oct 2010

  • Dickens might have been a self publicist, but he was also a social reformer. That his writings resonated with a readership seeking direction, and that a social movement of sorts collaborated to transform society (misguidedly?) reflects (I believe) more about the reader than the writer.

    We can't blame authors for the failure to find a readership willing to help transform social injustice from the writings, the blame lies elsewhere.

    Shame on us.

    Posted by George Michaelson on Sat 9 Oct 2010

  • Western NGOs have been working in these countries for decades, but what have the results been? They are staffed by white people working for western salaries too magnificent for them to spend in those countries without debauchery. I met one such man in Kolkata who had saved over a million dollars in ten years. I wonder how Maugham or Dickens would have portrayed them.

    Posted by Ashoke Dasgupta on Sat 9 Oct 2010

  • Various members of two generations of my famly have lived in Brazil for 40 years. The opening paragraphs of Dicken's Bleak House (and in fact, the whole novel) could have been writen about the Brazilian judicial system; slow, corrupt and biased to the elites.
    It should be compulsory reading for all 1st-year Brazilian law students.

    Posted by Nicola Clark Ayres on Sat 9 Oct 2010

  • This is a very fine article and I would certainly agree that a world similar to that of Dickens, Gissing, Balzac et al is more obviously discernable in the teeming cities of the developing world than in the West.

    Having said which, since Thatcher and Reagan began the process of reimposing nineteenth century economics on us, I find Victorian literature far more resonant of the world I live in than would have been the case when I was young, in the 1950s and 1960s, when Social Democratic welfare states guaranteed a degree of comfort, security and social equality.

    My youthful mid-century imagination fed itself on brutal dystopias such as '1984', flawed utopias such as 'Brave New World' and angst-filled commentaries on the essential baseness of human nature, such as 'Lord of the Flies'. Kafka or Camus certainly seemed more pertinent than John Galsworthy

    The threats to human promise tended, in the mid twentieth century to be imagined as coming from social and political conformity rather than economic insecurity.

    I might have enjoyed reading Victorian or turn-of-the-century authors but they didn't seem to have much to do with my world.

    Nowadays, however, novels of economically blighted or challenged lives seem much more pertinent than those haunted by the fear of a malevolent state. Have we come full circle or is this just the latest swing of the pendulum?

    Posted by Victor on Sun 10 Oct 2010

  • It's the same for Jane Austen, actually, in the parts of the developing world that have a growing middle class. The college kids in Asia have remarkably similiar opinions about love and marriage.

    Posted by PaulShandy on Sun 10 Oct 2010

  • Very well written piece, and no doubt true, but a single visit to Los Angeles's Skid Row would disabuse Packer of the notion that such hopelessness long since fled Western nations, most especially the United States. Speaking of which, what is this "welfare" to which he refers? It scarcely exists here at all, and would have to be at Scandinavian levels to eliminate the many skid rows containing the lost and damaged of the U.S.

    Posted by Robert Anderson on Mon 11 Oct 2010

  • I believe we fell in love with Slumdog Millionaire because of its reference to Dicken's Oliver Twist. Yet, what happens when the Western viewer essentializes the country and believes all 1 billion in India live like Oliver Twist? There is great diversity in places like Bombay which no film has been to capture as of yet.

    Posted by Samina on Mon 11 Oct 2010

  • Thoughtful, if sobering piece of writing. Thanks. The U.S. and the rest of the West have absorbed and now export the power of positive thinking and a religious get-ahead-ism as an answer to the inequity that people experience in the world for years. (See A Carnegie/Napoleon Hill, Norman Vincent Peal and now R. Byrne's 'The Secret'.) When people at home and abroad slavishly absorb the modes of thinking/meme's rather than confronting the issues and required action clearly (both possibilities and limits), they perhaps become heir to Dickens' Micawber ('Something will turn up.') There is an unsavory legacy and a cost to this behavior. Read Barbara Ehrenreich's 'Brightsided' and esp. Scott Sandage's 'Born Losers'.

    Is the West that much more advanced, or do we have more bright and shiny ways (from IPads to Facebook ) to distract and insulate ourselves from the realities of supposedly free-market capitalism? The abyss (illness, financial ruin, death) looms as a possibility for all of us, rich or poor, celebrity or prole. Social services agencies at home and NGOs abroad often provide just enough support to "empower" (and medicate) their less fortunate clients. This perpetuates much of the dysfunction that creates problems and limits the ability of the disenfranchised to find solutions -- while (as Mr. Packer notes) not incidentally ensuring employees of those agencies a paycheck and funding.

    Posted by Chuck Lanigan on Wed 13 Oct 2010

  • Nowadays, however, novels of economically blighted or challenged lives seem much more pertinent than those haunted by the fear of a malevolent state. Have we come full circle or is this just the latest swing of the pendulum?

    Posted by winter boots on Wed 20 Oct 2010

  • Occasionally it would be nice if writers would give sources for their information. 6,000 people a day arrive in Lagos? Says who? As usual, here is someone from the West trying to impose a narrative on Africa. It would be interesting and useful if Mr. Packer wrote about the experiences in Africa and about Africans on their terms and quit trying to find narratives from the West to tell us about Africa. West Africa is an amazing and fascinating mix of cultures and experience reflecting modern and traditional life. You can't separate Dickens' novels etc. from their contexts. "Oh this is how Africa is today." What drivel. If only it were so simple!

    Posted by joe on Sat 23 Oct 2010

  • I am quite intrigued by George Packer's essay, being that Lagos and its paradoxes had always been a subject of significant importance in all my writing; and particulary because a large segment of my current work (which is well in progress) is set in a prominent Lagos slum. I am interested in interacting further with Mr. Packer on this subject if he is so inclined. While not claiming to have acquired expertise on this topic in any way, I might be able to provide unique insights and perspectives.

    Posted by El-Nukoya on Sat 16 Apr 2011

Post a Comment

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.

Published In
The City
About the Author

George Packer is a staff writer for The New Yorker. His most recent books include Interesting Times: Writings from a Turbulent Decade and The Assassins’ Gate: America in Iraq.

Every city has a sex and an age which have nothing to do with demography. Rome is feminine. So is Odessa. London is a teenager, an urchin, and in this hasn’t changed since the time of Dickens. Paris, I believe, is a man in his twenties in love with an older woman.
John Berger, 1987
Visual Aids
Rites of Passage Coming-of-age rituals from around the world.
Art, Photography, & Illustrations View a selection of art from our latest issue.
Charts & Graphs All of our charts and graphs, pulled from the pages of Lapham’s Quarterly.
Events & News
June 2 / Tickets for the DECADES BALL are available now. Join us at our yearly gala to celebrate the 1870s with readings from the Quarterly with stars of stage and screen. More

Vague Premonitions

The Great Beyond

Current Issue Youth Summer 2014

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Audio & Video
LQ Podcast:
Robert Weide
Robert B. Weide talks about his decades-long production of a documentary on Kurt Vonnegut due to be released in 2015.
Lewis H. Lapham is Editor of Lapham's Quarterly. He also serves as editor emeritus and national correspondent for Harper's magazine.
Recent Issues