Wednesday, June 19th, 2013
Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr / Podcast

Blog

Roundtable

  • Laurel Fantauzzo

    Postcolonial Food Fight

    Tags:
    ,
    ,
    ,

    Purple_Yam.jpeg

    In 1860, a Spaniard in the Philippines described local cuisine in the magazine Ilustracion Filipino. “The condiments, the preparation, and the cooking are horrible,” he concluded. Eat Filipino entrees, he wrote, “as tasteless as they are lacking in nutritional value, and you have, in summary, the art of cooking as practiced by the native cook.”

    In 1898, Filipinos won independence from Spain, only to face Americans as their next colonizers. As resistance against American troops continued, a group of indigenous Filipinos were displayed as “wild dog-eaters” at the 1904 World’s Fair in Saint Louis, Missouri. Their dietary habits were sensationalized, in part, to convince an American audience that their country’s taking of the Philippines was justified.

    It’s not surprising that a colonizer might denigrate the native cuisine of its subjects. As Filipina food historian Doreen Fernandez wrote, “the food of the colonizer was deemed superior, urbane, ‘civilizing,’ greatly to be desired.”

    What still surprises me is how contempt for Filipino food exists today. “Do you serve dog here?” is a refrain one Filipino food truck owner has often heard, in modern-day Los Angeles. Some outsiders seem stuck, World’s-Fair style, on “shock” elements of Filipino cuisine. Balut, for example, is a fermented duck embryo eaten as an everyday snack in Manila. Gothamist, The Village Voice, and The New Yorker have all fixated on balut in articles about Filipino food.

    The same, scornful, 1860 Spaniard could have authored the comments on a 2010 San Francisco Chronicle article about Filipino restaurants: “There is no way Filipino food is the new Thai...They have disgusting dishes...I’ve smelled the stench that invariably turns out to be some Filipino ‘pood’.”

    My grandmother said to me daily, “Eat your pood!” At 92, she made me chicken afritada, and no tomato-based stew was ever so subtle, no potatoes so soft. The memory of her accent made me close my laptop.

    Chefs of Filipino cuisine in America do not have the option of ignoring culinary contempt. In San Mateo, chef Tim Luym runs Attic, which prominently features Filipino flavors in its menu. “If we classify ourselves under just Filipino food,” Luym says, “in the Michelin Guide or Zagat, people would just flip the page.”

    In San Francisco, Dominic Ainza omits “Filipino” from Mercury Lounge’s description in San Francisco, opting for “Global Asian Cuisine.” “I don't think it's going to take off,” Ainza says. “We’re still missing, in a sense. I always preface that with ‘I hope I'm wrong.’”

    In Brooklyn, chef King Phojanakong gestures outside his restaurant Umi Nom. “I think if you stop five people in the street and ask them where the Philippines is, maybe three might tell you where it is, and the other two will say, ‘What's the Philippines?’” he said. “Our food isn't bad! I love this food!”

    The highest-profile advocate for Filipino food in America is perhaps Amy Besa, cookbook author and front-of-house master of Purple Yam, also in Brooklyn. She’s weary of discussing the cuisine’s low profile. “The question is no longer relevant, because the food is out there. Bringing that up again is really an insult to all who’ve been working so hard to put it on the landscape.”

    My mother is one of 1.7 million migrants whose diaspora made Filipinos the second largest immigrant group in the U.S. today. And yet—at the risk of insulting Besa—the current number of Filipino restaurants in U.S. cities reaches double digits only in Los Angeles.

    What, then, is Filipino food?

    Precolonial Filipinos grilled, steamed, and preserved fresh seafood and vegetables with citrus fruits and vinegar. Chef Luym’s kinilaw embodies these methods. Pillowy orbs of butterfish are dressed with coconut milk, chopped Thai chilis, and flecks of cilantro. The effect is a colorful, piquant popping on the tongue, subsumed by smooth, melting sensation.

    Chinese traders brought woks, noodles, cooking oil, and spring rolls. Ainza tucks pork into egg roll wrappers for Mercury Lounge’s lumpia rolls, their savory, garlicky crunch brightened by cilantro. Post-1521, Spaniards added the stewing methods and Mexican rootcrops that informed my grandmother’s chicken afritada. Americans brought pies, sandwiches, and, after WWII, canned meats and fast food.

    In order to gain popularity in the U.S. culinary landscape, Besa says chefs of Filipino food must first establish the cuisine’s defining flavor and entrée. The flavor is pre-colonial: sourness. Filipinos have maintained their indigenous palate over centuries of invaders by using vinegar and lime-like calamansi as daily souring agents for everything from fish to noodles.

    The entree is adobo, an ever-adaptable vinegar-based marinade. Every Filipino chef, home or professional, has a version of adobo; Phojanakong’s braises slick strips of pork belly in coconut milk and sugar cane vinegar. The meat dissolves at first bite, flooding the mouth with fatty bliss.

    As they work toward mainstream acceptance, chefs of Filipino food are quick to name their most formidable obstacle in America: Filipinos in America.

    The first Filipino restaurants in the U.S. were turo-turo; “point point.” Entrees warm in a buffet; customers point to the foods they want; meals rarely rise above ten dollars. Purple Yam uses imported Filipino vinegars. Umi Nom buys seafood daily. Attic uses hand-collected Philippine sea salts. The resulting entrees make harsh skeptics of Filipino immigrants. Filipinos call Purple Yam to scream about its use of coconut milk in adobo; Filipinos complain Phojanakong’s prices are too high. After 1965, most Filipino migrants were white-collar workers with no need to open restaurants for economic gain. Their objections against current Filipino restaurants are so passionate, one might construe them as pre-emptive defenses against another possible colonizer.

    “What you’re facing,” Phojanakong says, “is a tough crowd.”

    Yet Filipino cuisine is slowly reaching America’s palate, with food trucks run by second-generation Fil-Ams garnering its newest popularity. In California, the instant, guerilla PR of Twitter and Facebook, tantalizing foodhounds with changing locations, helps Adobo Hobo, White Rabbit, and Señor Sisig thrive. Still, chefs of mobile and brick-and-mortar restaurants alike continue to fight old ignorance toward their cuisine. Perhaps, as Besa dreams, Filipino foodmakers in America can establish solidarity with each other with a regular national conference.

    Until then, anyone hungry might ignore centuries of haters, find a Filipino restaurant nearby, and try its adobo.

    In January 2011, I ate Purple Yam’s adobo. The chicken is a carefully browned piece of organic thigh and drumstick, draped with thick, lustrous broth. I fit a chunk of chicken atop a sauce-soaked dab of rice on my spoon, as I have at home all my life. As I emptied my plate, adjectives fled me. Which word to choose? Velvety? Unctuous? Dazzling?

    Amy Besa’s husband and business partner, chef Romy Dorotan, approached my table. The New York Times Magazine had recently featured his adobo in a two-page spread.

    “On Monday,” Dorotan told me, his Tagalog accent distinct, “we sold out of adobo.” He grinned. “Can you imagine? Purple Yam sold out of adobo?"

    September 27, 2011 Bookmark and Share
Roundtable Archive Love this? Subscribe to Lapham's Quarterly today.
Please enter a first name.
Please enter a last name.
Please enter an address.
Please enter a city.
Please select a state.
Please enter a valid
zip code.
Please select a country.

Canadian subscribers add $10; All other international subscribers add $40.

Comments Post a Comment »

  • http://www.purpleyamnyc.com/a-filipino-restaurant-in-brooklyn-in-1938/


    I don't think this Filipino restaurant(1927?)in Brooklyn was a turo-turo.

    romy

    Posted by romy dorotan on Tue 27 Sep 2011

  • Kudos to the author on a well-written and well-researched read. Last year, Amy Scattergood wrote a niece piece in the LA Times about high profile Filipino chefs and the lack of corresponding high profile Filipino restaurants. It's well worth reading. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/feb/25/food/la-fo-filipino25-20100225

    Finally, I agree very much with Chef Romy's point that turo-turo joints weren't, as the article opines, the first Filipino eating establishments in America. At the early part of the previous century, Filipino enclaves in LA and Stockton just to name of a few, featured a good number of Filipino-owned diners and luncheonettes and while not a restaurant, the legendary Tiki-Ti on Sunset has famously served up glorious tropical drinks since the early 60s.

    Posted by The Win on Wed 28 Sep 2011

  • Any food, if prepared and cooked correctly will be good, whether Filipino or American.

    Those of us who spread the good news about our cuisine, Filipino cuisine, haven't stopped,whether in words or through cooking.

    And we are proud that even here, in the Philippines, Filipinos have started to appreciate their own food, and consequently, their own culture.

    Micky Fenix
    food writer

    Posted by Micky Fenix on Fri 14 Oct 2011

  • Thanks for this article! Its a good thing there are more and more voices out there to speak to Filipino foods and break down that colonial baggage. There is no doubt that when we eat a bite of Filipino food - when we can find it outside - we are tasting history and all its legacies. And yes, there is a need to decolonize.

    As a young woman who cooks and advocates for healthy Filipino foods, some stereotyping I've encountered is that Filipino foods are too greasy, too brown, or claim its visually unappetizing...but to whose standards? When I've made vegetable-heavy renditions, I've heard this isn't "authentic" - though it's arguable that all-meat dishes are not easy to come by or affordable for many in the archipelago, and in fact in the provinces, many of my relatives do eat vegetable-heavy foods and fish because that's what's available.

    We have to grow this cuisine. In SF, the Asian Culinary Forum put on a symposium of Filipino flavors in May 2010. There's a growing Kulinarya foods competition, and as you wrote so well here, the daily work of chefs, home cooks, food writers, and anyone who eats, really, to turn the tide of misunderstanding on Filipino foods. Both the people and the cuisine survived and resisted colonization...what's next?

    Aileen
    Kitchen Kwento

    Posted by Aileen@kitchenkwento on Sat 12 Nov 2011

  • Great article,

    Overall, many Filipinos have grown shy of their very own cuisine, yet when you see various menues and restauarants throughout the world our staple dishes are similar and even more flavorful than those of our culinary neigbors: We have crispy or braised pork belly dishes like that from any region in Asia, stewed meat or fish dishes like those from Europe, Latin America and Asia, or coconut milk based dishes similar to that of Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand...overall whats there to be intimidated by? We are blessed to boast such a rich flavor profile.

    A major issue that Filipino Americans deal with is our quick assimilation to American culture. Ultimately, our palate for Filipino cuisine gets left behind with our nanays, tatays, lolos and titos. We ultimatly become highly critical of food besides what our relatives make at family parties and thus in some sense Filipino cuisine in America becomes restricted. On top of that our knowledge of our food becomes skewed to just the staples of adobo pancit and lumpia and all the family party "go to's" when in fact there is so much more.

    I am very excited for all the Fil-Ams out there creating/being inspired by/pushing our cuisine. Keep doing your thing. Stay inspired, we have something special.

    Posted by chase valencia on Mon 23 Jan 2012

Post a Comment

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.

RSS
RSS
Featured Contributor
Laurel Fantauzzo is an Iowa Arts Fellow at the University of Iowa's Nonfiction Writing Program. She received the 2010 Astraea Lesbian Foundation Emerging Writers Grant, and her work has appeared in New York magazine online, AP, and TheFilAm.net. She is currently in the Philippines on a Fulbright scholarship for her research project, "Jolli Meals: The Rise of Filipino Fast Food."
Recent Posts
  1. Fine-Feathered Friends — 06/11/2013: The plume craze of the late-nineteenth century made Manhattan one of the most diverse territories for bird-watching—on the hats of fashionable ladies.
  2. They Called Him Sergeant Stubby — 06/06/2013: A decorated WWI veteran, Sgt. Stubby became the military's most famous (and beloved) canine member.
  3. Her Majesty’s Rat-Catcher — 05/22/2013: Jack Black, the most famous rat-catcher in Victorian London, killed up to 8,000 rats in a year.
Archives
  1. June 2013
  2. May 2013
  3. April 2013
Blogroll
Man is the only animal that can remain on friendly terms with the victims he intends to eat until he eats them.
Samuel Butler, c. 1890
Events & News
June 15 / The summer issue of Lapham's Quarterly, "The Sea", hits newsstands and mailboxes. More
Apropos

Vague Premonitions

The Great Beyond

Subscribe
Current Issue Animals Spring 2013
Blogs

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Audio & Video
LQ Podcast:
Animal Minds
Jane Goodall, Irene Pepperberg, Virginia Morell, Frans de Waal, and others discuss our ever-expanding understanding of animal minds, and what exactly it means for us humans.
Eponym
Lewis H. Lapham is Editor of Lapham's Quarterly. He also serves as editor emeritus and national correspondent for Harper's magazine.
Recent Issues