Monday, May 21st, 2012
Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr / Podcast

Blog

Roundtable

  • Simon Maxwell Apter

    Maximilian’s Ghost

    Tags:
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,

    mexico490x300.jpg

    Mexico defeated a listless and bored-looking France 2-0 yesterday. With the win, El Tri is all but ticketed for the second round and Les Bleus, who haven’t scored a goal in two full games this World Cup, look likely to be sent home after group play. In 2002, France staged an equally bad showing, the centerpiece of which was a shocking 1-0 loss to Senegal, a former French colony. The loss to Mexico could be deemed a similar defeat.

    Many Americans relate to our Hispanophone neighbors to the south via Corona, Cuervo, and Cinco de Mayo, with little regard paid to actual Mexican history. This isn’t the worst thing in the world, as both brands are passable, mid-priced adult beverages, and any chance Americans get to learn even a few words of Spanish is a much-needed spell for our language program-cutting public schools. Nevertheless, due to the formidable marketing machines of those particular Mexican brands of booze, many of us treat May 5th as a Latino version of our own July 4th, which any Mexican will tell you it decidedly is not. The holiday celebrates the Mexican military victory over the French at the Battle of Puebla in 1862. There isn’t an equivalent American event, although the War of 1812’s Battle of New Orleans against Britain might come close. So, in one of the World Cup’s more obscure pairings of historical bedfellows, Thursday’s game between France and Mexico is—like Portugal vs. Brazil and England vs. the United States—a matchup between erstwhile occupier and occupied states.

    Between 1864 and 1867, the hastily convened Second Mexican Empire was a subject of France, ruled by Habsburg Emperor Maximilian I. (Most countries, including the United States, did not recognize the new government’s legitimacy.) Conservative Mexicans, known for a distinctive Francophilia and a desire to return Mexico to monarchy, had actually brought Maximilian (himself an Austrian) to the New World; liberals in turn coalesced around Benito Juárez, the Mexican president whose administration had been interrupted by the arrival of the French.

    Maximilian’s reign was marked by constant conflict, haplessness, and the increasing insanity of his Belgian wife, Charlotte. When his boss, Napoleon III, determined that the French adventure in Mexico had become an unsuccessful boondoggle and withdrew his troops, Maximilian refused to follow suit, citing loyalty to his conservative supporters and to their notion of an Imperial Mexico. Interestingly, Maximiliano I, as he was known, was a fairly liberal emperor who might have done the Mexican lower classes some good, had they not detested the fact that he was a foreign interloper. Juárez’s Republicans rooted out the empire in 1867, Maximilian was executed by firing squad, and Juárez would go on to become Mexican history’s greatest hero.

    Unlike the choler unleashed when the Germans meet one of European countries against whom they fought a world war or two, there isn’t a lot of vitriol surrounding the French-Mexican “rivalry.” Mexico, of course, saves its venom for its other, more recent (and unofficial) imperial occupier, the United States, and the French savor a victory over the Germans more than a win over a Latin American nation (their 3-0 win in the 1998 World Cup Final against Brazil notwithstanding). Yet like Napoleon III, who felt that takeover of Mexico could bolster his empire, the French approached this soccer game against El Tri with a similar attitude. Aging stars, internal discord, and subpar play—all on display in last week’s 0-0 tie against Uruguay—have brought a note of desperation to the French side, who last tasted glory in 2000 when they won the European Championship. Mexico, itself humbled by its surprising 1-1 tie with South Africa in the tournament’s opening match, came into this latter-day Battle of Puebla with the opportunity to reassert its legitimacy as a soccer power; who better to do it against than the majesty of Les Bleus?

    June 18, 2010 Bookmark and Share
Roundtable Archive Love this? Subscribe to Lapham's Quarterly today.

Get one free trial issue of Lapham's Quarterly!

  • Fill out this order form.
  • If you like the magazine, get the rest of the year for just $49 (4 issues in all).
  • If not, simply write cancel on the bill, return it, and owe nothing.
Please enter a first name.
Please enter a last name.
Please enter an address.
Please enter a city.
Please select a state.
Please enter a valid
zip code.
Please select a country.

Canadian subscribers add $10; All other international subscribers add $40.

Post a Comment

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.

RSS
RSS
Featured Contributor
Simon Maxwell Apter is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in the Virginia Quarterly Review, The Nation, The Guardian, and The American Prospect.
Recent Posts
  1. Back Matter — 04/13/2012: “The world is a great volume, and man the Index of that Book."
  2. The Myth of the Fourth Estate — 04/03/2012: We should think of reading the paper and watching the news as acts belonging to the world of ritual as much as the commerce of information.
  3. Living in the Margins — 03/22/2012: In medieval marginalia, you might find complaining monks, a nun breastfeeding a monkey, and sexual wordplay. Oh, and doodles, lots of doodles.
Archives
  1. April 2012
  2. March 2012
  3. December 2011
Blogroll
What a glut of books! Who can read them? As already, we shall have a vast chaos and confusion of books; we are oppressed with them, our eyes ache with reading, our fingers with turning.
Robert Burton, 1621
Events & News
May 3 / London Review of Books editor Mary-Kay Wilmers is in conversation with Lewis Lapham at 192 Books about family histories. More
Reader Survey Take the LQ reader survey! Your two cents will help us keep making history ... Take Survey
Apropos

In Stir

No. 44

Subscribe
Current Issue Means of Communication Spring 2012
Blogs

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Audio & Video
LQ Podcast:
DARE
Delve into the history of DARE, the Dictionary of American Regional English, with LQ contributor Simon Winchester and DARE chief editor Joan Hall.
Eponym
Lewis H. Lapham is Editor of Lapham's Quarterly. He also serves as editor emeritus and national correspondent for Harper's magazine.
Site Sponsor
Recent Issues