
In 1597 a grim invoice made its way to the family of Cathin Joyeuse, recently deceased. Known to her fellow villagers of Toul, France, as the Mayoress Etienne, the bill’s itemized contents were sober and matter-of-fact, a collection of figures and sums belying the startling ordeal the Mayoress had faced during her last month on earth: ten francs for the attorney, twenty for “him who conducted the trial,” one franc owed to the “woman who shaved her,” four required for “inspecting the court record,” and twenty francs due to the torturer for services rendered. Like countless others accused of witchcraft in Renaissance Europe, Joyeuse had fallen prey to a vile, codified process of imprisonment, torture, coerced confession, and execution. In their grief, her family was now forced to foot the bill.
“Witch hunting,” wrote the historian Rossell Hope Robbins, “was self-sustaining and became a major trade, employing many people, all battening on the savings of the victims.” The costs of a witch trial were usually paid for by the estate of the accused or their family. Far from the conventional image of a penniless hag, a significant proportion of accused witches, especially in Germany, were wealthy and male. Their property was seized to pay the clergymen, judges, physicians, torturers, guards, scribes, and laborers who raked in increasingly large sums of money, as well as other reliable assets. With a single member accused, a moderately wealthy family could be ruined permanently. Father Cornelius Loos, the first German critic of the witch hunts, wrote in 1592:
”Wretched creatures are compelled by the severity of the torture to confess things they have never done, and so by cruel butchery innocent lives are taken; and, by a new alchemy, gold and silver are coined from human blood.”
After a bill had been paid, the property that remained was susceptible to seizure by kings, bishops, local noblemen, autonomous towns, or the Inquisition itself. In Elizabethan England, where witchcraft carried a life sentence, the possessions of the accused became property of the Crown. In seventeenth-century Salem, Massachusetts, the legislation demanded that those acquitted remain in jail until they had paid off the cost of their unlawful imprisonment. In one famous instance, Tituba, a key witness exonerated in 1693 during the Salem witch trials, lacked the money to pay for her thirteen-month incarceration. She remained in prison—with ever-mounting debt—until an unknown person finally paid for her purchase as a slave.
A sampling of witch-trial bills reveals unique and often peculiar regional practices. Shackles for a man in Salem cost five shillings, while handcuffs and lighter leg shackles for a woman ran seven shillings, six pence. Those accused in Offenberg, Germany were charged as much as thirty-two florins for the “entertainment and banquet of the judges, priests, and advocate” after every court session. One hapless Frenchman in 1659 was ordered to pay the cost of searching his house for “witch powders.” In Scotland, reflecting the country’s preferred method of burning, two Aberdeen witches in 1596 were charged ninety shillings, eight pence for “twenty loads of peat”, “a boll [six bushels] of coal”, and “four tar barrels,” a bill equivalent to about $1,800 today. A more unmistakable example of the pain-for-pay ethos of Europe’s witch hunts is the “Tariff for Torture,” a document approved in 1757 by the Archbishopric of Cologne to enact a standardized “price list” for such gruesome services as “terrorizing by showing the instruments of torture” (one reichsthaler, the currency of the Holy Roman Empire), “putting in the pillory, branding, and whipping” (two reichsthaler), “cutting out the tongue entirely” (five reichsthaler), and “breaking alive on the wheel” (four reichsthaler), around the cost of a one volume of Bach sheet music at the time.
“This movement was promoted by many in office, who looked for wealth in the ashes of the victims,” wrote Johann Linden, a canon of Treves Cathedral, whose History of Treves (1590) is an important chronicle of the big-business aspect of witch hunts:
And so, from court to court throughout the towns and villages of all the diocese scurried special accusers, inquisitors, notaries, jurors, judges, constables, dragging to trial and torture human beings of both sexes and burning them in great numbers So far, at length, did the madness of the furious populace and of the courts go in this thirst for blood and booty that there was scarcely anybody who was not smirched by suspicion of this crime. Meanwhile notaries, copyists, and innkeepers grew rich. The executioner rode a blooded horse, like a noble of the court, and went clad in gold and silver; his wife vied with noble dames in the richness of her array.
Linden’s account captures the severity of Europe’s most intolerable period of witch hunts, which occurred from about 1580 to 1630. During this time, outbreaks and panics swept through villages and surrounding regions as confessions, under stress of pain, quickly led to the naming of other supposed accomplices. Though witch trials would continue intermittently throughout the first half of the eighteenth century, the most intense period of outbreaks gradually came to a close in many places with the disappearance of seizable property and the fading of profits. After the Holy Roman Emperor forbade the confiscation of property in 1630, witchcraft persecutions declined noticeably in some places. Bamberg, Germany, which had seen an average of a hundred executions a year from 1626 to 1629, burned that year only twenty-four; none were executed the year after. The city of Cologne, which had from the outset prohibited the seizing of property, experienced the fewest executions of any region of the Empire. Though the curbing of profits was not the sole reason for the halting of witch trials in every region, the desire to make a killing—as common then as it is today—suggests that it must have played some part in curtailing the practice. Linden, who had seen his city transformed into a circus of vested interests, describes how regulations were devised, the witch hunting industry wavered, then collapsed: “At last, though the flames were still unsated, the people grew impoverished, rules were made and enforced restricting the costs of examinations and the profits of the inquisitors, and suddenly, as when in war funds fail, the zeal of the persecutors died out.”
Related:
372 / Antioch
Witch Hunt
"But severe torture failed to extort a confession, and merely demonstrated that the distinguished defendants were utterly devoid of any guilty knowledge."
2008 / New York City
Not on the Books
"Witchcraft, if it exists, is by its nature impossible to prove, since it involves the alleged use of supernatural powers."
1692 / Salem
Witness Credibility
"That the devils have a natural power which makes them capable of exhibiting what shape they please, I suppose nobody doubts."
Image: A Jew's daughter accused of witchcraft in the Middle Ages, 1866. NYPL Digital Collection.
July 16, 2012
Canadian subscribers add $10; All other international subscribers add $40.
Comments Post a Comment »
What do you understand the celine dion las vegas showThe initially I saw Celine Dion live was an auspicious date, Although I hardly understood why at the time. acquired my 26th birthday, She was a student in the post-Titanic throes of her let's talk about Love tour, And my and after that-Partner surprised me with tickets I'd later realize he charged to my unsecured debt. but that's a whole other tacky matter.The date was september 16, 1998. Any coloured-with regard to-the type of-Wool Vegas devotee worth his chips must comprehend this as the day that Steve Wynn's Bellagio opened. Just a mile west of the Thomas Mack where Celine crooned along with videotaped shows by Barbra Streisand and the Bee Gees, The crème of the las vegas crop was eating richly, Drinking liberally and ushering in a milestone in the city's history with the debut actions of the Cirque du Soleil aquatic spectacle O.It's sort of funny straight into now, Because it just goes to show how completely unlikely it was then that Celine would go on a few years later to stake her own claim at revolutionizing Las Vegas. Or that it is that Cirque production, Helmed after Franco Dragone, That would famously convince her that she wanted to deviate radically from the traditional pop-star rated-with regard to-the-Prime script as a long-Term nevada headliner.and so, After nearly five special years, Queen Celine is voluntarily abdicating, Flinging herself off her ginormous Colosseum throne with gusto and back into the whirlwind of intercontinental tours, Record promotion and maybe additional parenthood. And I can hear the hipsters and want to be hipsters among you who huff "brilliant riddance, and also "Who loves you, And pity you for having no appreciation for the point that she ever graced us with her regime.Now is the time for all good-Hearted people who love this city and holiday location to lay down their arms and embrace our gentle, good-hearted departing monarch. It's not about the music activity, So if your gripe with Dion is that she over-Belts sugary bridal-Dance ballads that appeal to people who wouldn't know The Cure from Tupac, Then you're as arrogant and elitist in your own way as you think that Celine's fans are toward you and yours.This moment is massive. As major as one more days of the Rat Pack or Elvis.especially.It is not overstating it to say that Celine Dion revolutionized Las Vegas at least as much as that other major brand from Quebec you've probably heard of around here. She didn't have to do it, to make sure, But the girl did. buyers., She was payed handsomely-Detractors may assert obscenely-as it. But as she provides, She's done more for us than we've in serious trouble her.don't think me? no less than her successor, the particular inimitable Bette Midler Celine bag, Told me in a recent career that without Celine, There'd be no Elton steve, No barry Manilow, not for Toni Braxton, No president. Pick your bliss, no matter what the genre, And when Celine proved that Vegas was a powerful, Highly profitable and personally fulfilling place to hold off, That text message got out."The effect is perfectly huge, monumental, Midler said of Celine's payoff time. "She was a huge headliner, And she made a solution. It was a choice that much other people wouldn't have made at the time, And it opened a lot of people's eyes to the possibility not just to the Colosseum but to all of Vegas. but it was a very sharp and shrewd move, And also she had fun,there's not any doubt there's a large chunk of this magazine's audience that must think I'm a square queer by now. And to that I'll clarify that I haven't been kind to Celine or the show myself. I even told LA Times holiday-Section readers likely better advised to see Clint Holmes if they're looking for an amazing headliner experience. And I have wondered in print large enough. simplicity of Celine's bio-She married her manager as a teenager and became a mammoth pop star-Made her lack personal knowledge the desperation of loneliness and heartache contained in the lyrics of some of her songs.But more recently I realized I'd missed something impressive about her personal story that will earn her a salute even from the cooler-as compared-Thou public: This woman has taken more abuse than virtually noncontroversial pop-Culture figure and just kept truck along anyway. She never lamented. That's charm-producing.extremely, The cool kids can't help individual. She gave loads of having access to Newsweek recently, And they treated her with a largely sunny tribute, apart from the first sentence of the story opened: "Celine Dion 's going to try to sing. that isn't a setup for a joke,Born to an excessive, Impoverished relative, Dion emerged as a teen star in in france they-Speaking world after her manager and future husband René Angélil mortgaged his home to finance her first record.
Related articles:
http://www.hisparelax.org/members/xixi123
Posted by anonymous on Thu 20 Sep 2012