Friday, July 25th, 2014
Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr / Podcast

Blog

Roundtable

  • Ben Tarnoff

    “As For Me, I Sell Abuse”

    Tags:
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,

    ambroseoscar.jpg

    “That sovereign of insufferables, Oscar Wilde, has ensued with his opulence of twaddle and his penury of sense. He has mounted his hind legs and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck…has tossed off the top of his head and uttered himself in copious overflows of ghastly bosh.”

    At first glance, Ambrose Bierce didn’t look like a coldblooded verbal killer. He was tall and handsome and scrupulously groomed. He had babyishly smooth cheeks, and a cherubic mop of golden hair. He excelled as a conversationalist, drinking buddy, and womanizer. Beneath this charismatic façade, however, was nineteenth-century America’s greatest insult artist, a writer who produced some of the most vicious prose in the history of the English language.

    Bierce saw life as an exercise in cruelty, a conclusion drawn from close observation. He enlisted in the Union Army at the age of eighteen and spent four years in the slaughterhouse of the Civil War, watching men die in every conceivable way. Certain images stuck: a colonel on horseback decapitated by a cannonball, a soldier leaking brains from a bullet hole in his temple. Bierce fought bravely. He distinguished himself in combat and rose swiftly through the ranks. He even got shot in the head by a Confederate sharpshooter, and survived.

    Despite his own heroism, Bierce had no illusions about the heroism of war. He had seen his friends carved up like cattle, and came away convinced of the world’s wickedness. His boyhood self died on the battlefield, he told a friend. What survived was a man obsessed by death, who kept a loaded .45 under his coat and a human skull on his desk, and felt a darkly comic disgust for the things society held sacred.

    He might’ve become another battle-scarred crank, muttering to himself. Fortunately, he could write. After the war, Bierce settled in San Francisco and became a
    columnist for a satirical weekly. He ridiculed everything from religion to baseball to senior citizens to Yosemite, whose beauty so incensed him that he called for its destruction with gunpowder. He eviscerated anyone who displeased him, no matter how insignificant or undeserving—a method one observer compared to “breaking butterflies on a wheel.” Once, when a few readers told him to tone it down, he advised them to “continue selling shoes, selling pancakes, or selling themselves. As for me, I sell abuse.”

    Writers were among his favorite victims. He could be particularly hard on San Francisco’s other scribblers, those “lettered fools with phosphorized teeth in mouths full of moonshine.” So in 1882, when Oscar Wilde came to town on an speaking tour of North America, the thirty-nine-year old Bierce warmed up his pen. Wilde was only twenty-seven and already famous for wearing silk stockings and feeding witty quotes to reporters. He hadn’t yet written his masterpieces, but he had published a book of poems, and engineered a masterful publicity campaign as an apostle of a new art movement called Aestheticism. Crowds from Boston to St. Louis turned out to see this exotic creature speak of a renaissance in English literature and beseech them to “love art for its own sake.”

    Bierce hated Wilde. This “gawky gowk has the divine effrontery to link his name with those of Swinburne, Rossetti, and Morris,” he fumed. “He dares to set his tongue to the honored name of John Keats.” Bierce had spent three magical years in England during the 1870s, and returned to San Francisco an ardent Anglophile. Now he had suffered the supreme indignity of seeing an “intellectual jellyfish” like Wilde position himself as an heir to a tradition Bierce loved.

    The outburst offered a useful reminder that Bierce, for all his apparent nihilism, cared deeply about certain things. He might pretend to gaze on the human race “as one looks into an anthill,” but he wrote like someone who had skin in the game. He got as far away as he could from the pious Protestantism of his parents, but he could sound almost preacherly in his roasting of frauds and fools and hypocrites. He despised racial prejudice, and stood up for embattled Chinese and Mormon minorities. He blasted railroad baron Collis P. Huntington as the “swine of the century,” and spoke out against the imperialist idiocy of the Spanish-American War.

    His judgments weren’t always sound. He called Susan B. Anthony a “hatchet-faced old angularity,” and condemned women’s rights. But ultimately, he had ideals, a vision of how the world should be. While he could be vicious, he was capable of compassion, which he put to brilliant effect in his short fiction about the Civil War. He was even willing, occasionally, to soften his judgments. By 1904, Bierce had revised his opinion of the decadent Irishman. “Wilde’s work is all right,” he told a friend. By then Wilde was dead, and Bierce was barely a decade away from disappearing. In 1913, he announced he was going to Mexico to see the revolution. “Nobody will find my bones,” he promised, and nobody did.

    Historians have spent the last century looking for them. He may have died on a Mexican battlefield, or committed suicide in the Grand Canyon. The theories are endless, and Bierce surely wanted it that way. In one of his final letters, he told his cousin not to worry if she someday heard that he had met a violent end. “It beats old age, disease, or falling down the cellar stairs.” He loved life enough to care about how he left it. And he had spent so much time thinking about death that he wanted his own to be special: not a quiet passing but a mysterious destruction, the kind that would inspire later generations to imagine it in various ways.

    Related:

    The Reply Churlish
    1882 / San Francisco
    “Not only has he no thought, but no thinker.”

    Oscar Wilde Arranges an Interview
    1895 / London
    “Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone.”

    Schadenfreude
    c. 1870 / Boston
    “Sometimes lecturers who were new to the business did not know the value of ‘trying it on a dog.’“

    February 10, 2014 Bookmark and Share
Roundtable Archive Love this? Subscribe to Lapham's Quarterly today.

Post a Comment

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.

RSS
RSS
Featured Contributor
Ben Tarnoff is the author of The Bohemians: Mark Twain and the San Francisco Writers Who Reinvented American Literature, which will be published by the Penguin Press in March. His most recent essay for Lapham's Quarterly appears in the Winter 2014 issue, Comedy. His website is bentarnoff.com.
Recent Posts
  1. The Riot of Spring — 06/17/2014: The 1913 premiere of The Rite of Spring was no less than a revolution in modern dance, but it was the violence of the audience reaction that would shake the world.
  2. Alternative Histories — 06/10/2014: Falling down the rabbit hole of alternate history forums, where speculation and luck have encouraged domestic terrorists to change the course of history.
  3. The Revolution Will be Mummified — 05/29/2014: When the preservation of dead bodies becomes political, from Oliver Cromwell’s head to Che Guevara’s hands.
Archives
  1. July 2014
  2. June 2014
  3. May 2014
Blogroll
I’ve never understood why people consider youth a time of freedom and joy. It’s probably because they have forgotten their own.
Margaret Atwood, 1976
Events & News
June 2 / Tickets for the DECADES BALL are available now. Join us at our yearly gala to celebrate the 1870s with readings from the Quarterly with stars of stage and screen. More
Apropos

Vague Premonitions

The Great Beyond

Subscribe
Current Issue Youth Summer 2014
Blogs

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Audio & Video
LQ Podcast:
Robert B. Weide
The “Curb Your Enthusiasm” producer and Woody Allen “American Masters” director discusses his documentary on Kurt Vonnegut that has been decades in the making.
Eponym
Lewis H. Lapham is Editor of Lapham's Quarterly. He also serves as editor emeritus and national correspondent for Harper's magazine.
Recent Issues