Saturday, April 19th, 2014
Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr / Podcast

Blog

Deja Vu

November 30, 2012

Union Busting

Tags:
,
,
,
,
,

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

2012: After the recent reelection of President Barack Obama, conservatives across the country have attempted to regroup, but some in Texas have suggested they might be better off as a new nation of their own. Texas secessionists have started a petition for removal from the Union that has received tens of thousands of signatures, but some of the details have yet to be resolved. The New York Times reports:

The secession movement in Texas is divergent, with differences in goals and tactics. One group, the Republic of Texas, says that secession is unnecessary because, it claims, Texas is an independent nation that was illegally annexed by the United States in 1845. (The group’s leader and other followers waged a weeklong standoff with the Texas Rangers in 1997 that left one of its members dead.) Mr. Kilgore, the candidate who is changing his middle name, said he had not signed the White House petition because he did not believe that Texans needed to ask Washington for permission to leave.

“Our economy is about 30 percent larger than that of Australia,” said Mr. Kilgore, 48, a telecommunications contractor. “Australia can survive on their own, and I don’t think we’ll have any problem at all surviving on our own in Texas.”

1860: The election of Abraham Lincoln plunged an already ideologically fractured nation into turmoil, and South Carolina, the first state to secede from the Union, was especially vocal in its displeasure. The New York Times reprinted an editorial from a Charleston newspaper that derided Lincoln and advocated a dismantling of the Union:

The inquiry necessarily addresses itself to every man—Is the election of Lincoln, in itself and by itself, a hostile act? Doe it endanger the peace or threaten the liberties of the South? All admit that his election will be conclusive evidence of a sectional domination, avowedly aggressive, and proclaiming a purpose reconsistent with the enjoyment of our rights and the maintenance of State equality.

For myself, I am free to declare that the election ought to be regarded as an act of determined hostility; and I regard it also as immediately threatening the peace and safety of the South. As such, we should not wait till we experience the first or least of its pernicious consequences; but forseeing them, put ourselves at once in the attitude of independence, and thus escape or be prepared to defend ourselves against them.

Bookmark and Share
Love this? Subscribe to Lapham's Quarterly today.

Post a Comment

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.

RSS
RSS
Recent Posts
  1. Hair Apparent — 03/31/2014: Western media speculates on North Korean grooming standards; in 1698, Peter the Great taxes beards.
  2. Golden Menageries — 02/24/2014: In Ukraine, an ousted leader’s menagerie is exposed; in 1794, France wonders about the place of caged animals in the new republic.
  3. Right of Return — 02/12/2014: A new law encourages the return of Sephardic Jews to Spain; in 1492, Ferdinand and Isabella issue an edict with long-lasting consequences.
Deja Vu Archive
  1. April 2014
  2. March 2014
  3. February 2014
Blogroll
The brutalities of progress are called revolutions. When they are over we realize this: that the human has been roughly handled, but that it has advanced.
Victor Hugo, 1862
Events & News
January 27 / Purchase tickets for "Death & Comedy" a celebration of readings from our two most recent issues at Joe's Pub. More
Apropos

Vague Premonitions

The Great Beyond

Subscribe
Current Issue Revolutions Spring 2014
Blogs
Audio & Video
LQ Podcast:
Orlando Figes
The Russian historian describes the Revolution’s retreat in the 1920s from its high communist ideals under the New Economic Policy.
Eponym
Lewis H. Lapham is Editor of Lapham's Quarterly. He also serves as editor emeritus and national correspondent for Harper's magazine.
Recent Issues