2011: The London riots began as a reaction to a police shooting, but have since morphed into general lawlessness throughout much of England, the source of which varies from looter to looter. Prime Minister David Cameron responded to the spreading violence, paying condolences and endorsing civility:
Let me, first of all, completely condemn the scenes that we have seen on our television screens and people have witnessed in their communities.
These are sickening scenes—scenes of people looting, vandalising, thieving, robbing, scenes of people attacking police officers and even attacking fire crews as they're trying to put out fires. This is criminality, pure and simple, and it has to be confronted and defeated.
I feel huge sympathy for the families who've suffered, innocent people who've been burned out of their houses and to businesses who have seen their premises smashed, their products looted and their livelihoods potentially ruined.
I also feel for all those who live in fear because of these appalling scenes that we've seen on the streets of our country. People should be in no doubt that we are on the side of the law-abiding—law-abiding people who are appalled by what has happened in their own communities.
387: In response to an unwanted tax imposed by the Emperor Theodosius, a mob of citizens and local officials of Antioch tore down painted wooden panels and bronze statues of the imperial family and dragged the loot through the streets. After setting fire to a house and attempting to ignite more buildings, the riot was finally quelled by law enforcement. John Chrysostom, at that time a governing priest in Antioch, awaiting a possibly harsh retaliation from the emperor, delivered a homily lamenting the disruption:
What shall I say, or what shall I speak of? The present season is one for tears, and not for words; for lamentation, not for discourse; for prayer, not for preaching. Such is the magnitude of the deeds daringly done; so incurable is the wound, so deep the blow, even beyond the power of all treatment, and craving assistance from above. Thus it was that Job, when he had lost all, sat himself down upon a dunghill; and his friends heard of it, and came, and seeing him, while yet afar off, they rent their garments, and sprinkled themselves with ashes, and made great lamentation. The same thing now ought all the cities around to do, to come to our city and to lament with all sympathy what has befallen us. He then sat down on his dunghill; she is now seated in the midst of a great snare. For even as the devil then leaped violently the flocks, and herds, and all the substance of the just man, so now has he raged against this whole city. But then, as well as now, God permitted it; then, indeed, that he might make the just man more illustrious by the greatness of his trials; and now, that he may make us more sober-minded by the extremity of this tribulation. Allow me to mourn over our present state. We have been silent seven days, even as the friends of Job were. Allow me to open my mouth today, and to bewail this common calamity.
Who, beloved, has bewitched us? Who has envied us? Whence has all this change come over us? Nothing was more dignified than our city! Now, never was anything more pitiable! The populace so well ordered and quiet, yea, even like a tractable and well-tamed steed, always submissive to the hands of its rulers, has now so suddenly started off with us, as to have wrought such evils, as one can hardly dare to mention.
Canadian subscribers add $10; All other international subscribers add $40.
Comments Post a Comment »
The man to blame for the recent riots in London has been dead almost ten years. His name was John Edward Poynder Grigg, better known to people of my generation - because he hadn't yet renounced his title - as Lord Altringham. In August 1957, his lordship committed the unthinkable: he launched a personal attack on the Queen. In an article in the National and English Review, which he edited, Grigg described Her Majesty's style of speaking as "a pain in the neck". "She appears to be unable to string even a few sentences together without a written text," complained Grigg, adding that "the personality conveyed by the utterances which are put into her mouth is that of a priggish schoolgirl, captain of the hockey team, a prefect, and a recent candidate for Confirmation".
I was nearing sixteen at the time, and I vividly remember the collective gasp of shock and horror that went up from the whole country. It was as if a senior cardinal had loudly, repeatedly and deliberately farted in St. Peter's while the Pope was delivering a homily. Only it was much, much worse than that, and, predictably, it was followed by a veritable frenzy of vilification in the nation's media. In what was a relatively mild rebuke compared with some, the Daily Mail columnist Henry Fairlie blasted Grigg for "daring to pit his infinitely (sic) tiny and temporary mind against the accumulated experience of centuries".
The Fairlies of Britain could protest all they liked, but they were wasting their breath; the genie of irreverance was out of his bottle. Before Altringham, we had all recognized that our minds were relatively tiny and so we willingly deferred to the accumulated experience of our elders and betters. After all, in elementary school we had been taught to sing:
The rich man in his castle,
the poor man at his gate,
God made them high or lowly
and ordered their estate.
So even if there had been enormous numbers of unemployed black youths in England in 1957 (there weren't), and even if a policeman had shot one of them (impossible because the police didn't carry guns in those days), it is unlikely that a single shop would have gone up in flames. But post Altringham the unthinkable was not only thinkable but also speakable and doable. Exactly a year after Altringham published his article, the London borough of Notting Hill erupted in a major - or what counted for major in those days - race riot. Not, incidentally, the handiwork of disaffected blacks, but of thuggish racist whites.
Lord Altringham died a commoner in 2001, having renounced his title in 1963, but the effects of his lèse-majesté live on. So does the queen whom he criticized - but she hasn't sounded like a priggish schoolgirl for lo these many years.
Posted by Nabljuduvach on Mon 15 Aug 2011